Infertility Research - Male and Female Infertility, Treatment, Causes, Pregnancy

Infertility Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Infertility, including details on male and female infertility, treatment, causes, pregnancy.


Infertility Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Infertility

Books on Infertility

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Catheter type does not affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: a prospective randomized study.

Fancsovits P, Toth L, Murber A, Szendei G, Papp Z, Urbancsek J

First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary. fancsi@noi1.sote.hu

OBJECTIVE: To compare the main outcome of IUI with the Gynetics catheter (Gynetics Medical Products, Hamont-Achel, Belgium) or the Makler cannula (Sefi-Medical Instruments, Haifa, Israel). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Infertility and endocrinology unit in a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Two hundred fifty-one infertile couples undergoing 784 consecutive IUI treatments. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly assigned to undergo IUI treatment with either the Gynetics catheter (124 patients) or the Makler cannula (127 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were pregnancy and cumulative pregnancy rates. Secondary outcome measures were the ease of introduction of the catheter, the presence of bleeding, and semen regurgitation after removal of the catheter. RESULT(S): The use of the Gynetics catheter resulted in similar pregnancy (10.4% vs. 9.7%) and cumulative pregnancy rates (27.9% vs. 26.4%) as compared with the Makler cannula. Difficult introduction of the catheter was more frequent in the Gynetics group than in the Makler group (19.4% vs. 8.0%, respectively), but the frequency of bleeding did not differ between groups. Sample regurgitation was observed more often in the Makler group than in the Gynetics group (49.9% vs. 17.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): A lower frequency of sperm regurgitation and a higher frequency of difficult introduction was observed when the Gynetics catheter was used. However, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates with use of either the Gynetics catheter or the Makler cannula.

Published 7 March 2005 in Fertil Steril, 83(3): 699-704.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Infertility Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Infertility Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)



Infertility Books

Infertility in Practice, Third Edition (Reproductive Medicine & Assisted Reproductive Techniques)

Infertility in Practice, Third Edition (Reproductive Medicine & Assisted Reproductive Techniques)